|
|
Post by Savant on Mar 30, 2015 13:44:04 GMT -6
Just wanting to test the waters of the Chicago meta where it comes to Spec-Ops in a tournament setting.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeremy on Mar 30, 2015 13:55:26 GMT -6
I like Spec-Ops. It's fun to have some ability to further customize a model in your list.
|
|
|
|
Post by kelreth on Mar 30, 2015 14:05:58 GMT -6
Spec-Ops can be fun. I enjoyed running a Spec-Ops around a combine ship two years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by drobuff on Mar 30, 2015 14:38:30 GMT -6
I liked the one time I did it. Would love to do it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angron on Mar 31, 2015 5:41:58 GMT -6
I'm not a fan in tournament settings. What's the point of the armies having limitations if they can be corrected by a sub 20 point line infantry?
|
|
|
|
Post by kelreth on Mar 31, 2015 8:20:21 GMT -6
O tournament setting.
Spec-Ops do eliminate weaknesses in those. Hassassins would be less tedious with a Spec Ops
|
|
|
|
Post by jerimy on Mar 31, 2015 10:30:52 GMT -6
Put me down for disliking them in tournaments. It is extra bookkeeping and it is hard for you to keep track of your opponents spec-op upgrades.
|
|
|
|
Post by scadugenga on Mar 31, 2015 20:51:04 GMT -6
It's a different way to play, so I dig em.
|
|
|
|
Post by moondoggy on Apr 1, 2015 22:35:47 GMT -6
I like them allows you to bring something different and do different things that someone may not be ready for.
|
|
